Arbor Asset Management, LLC, et al., Respondents,
v.
Hari Singh et al., Appellants. (And a Third-Party Action.).
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 15, 2020.
Decided December 15, 2020.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Tyson & Mendes, LLP, New York ( Robert Modica of counsel), for Court Wing, appellant.
Winget, Spadafora & Schwartzberg, LLP, New York ( Dianna D. McCarthy of counsel), for Hari Singh, Crossfit NYC Holdings, LLC and Crossfit NYC, LLC, appellants.
The Stolper Group, LLP, New York ( Michael Stolper of counsel), for respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Defendants contend that the motion court erred in ignoring their statement of material fact and that, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 202.70(g) (Commercial Division rule 19-a[c]), any evidentiary matter in the statement not specifically controverted should have been deemed admitted. However, Justice Schecter's rules provide that only a joint Rule 19-a statement agreed upon by the parties will be considered (Practices for Part 54, Summary...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
