Given defendants' disclosure that defendant Ruhnn was shifting to a "platform" model for its online sales and away from the self-owned, "full service" model, the omission of data from the period immediately preceding the issuance of the final prospectus showing that there had already been a reduction in the full service segment of the company did not "significantly alter[] the `total mix' of information made available" to a reasonable
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
JIANMING LYU v. RUHNN HOLDINGS LTD.
189 A.D.3d 441 (2020)
137 N.Y.S.3d 322
2020 NY Slip Op 07282
Jianming Lyu, Respondent, v. Ruhnn Holdings Limited et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 3, 2020.
Decided December 3, 2020.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, New York ( George S. Wang of counsel), for Ruhnn Holdings Limited and Xiaocao XU, appellants.
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York ( Scott D. Musoff of counsel), for Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and UBS Securities LLC, appellants.
Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, San Diego, CA ( Joseph D. Daley of the bar of the State of California, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel), and Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, Melville ( William J. Geddish , of the bar of the State of California, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel), for respondent.
Concur—Friedman, J.P., Kapnick, Gesmer, Kern, Shulman, JJ.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.