Supreme Court properly upheld respondent's decision to refuse to disclose the names of respondent's 2008 to 2014 retirees, on the ground the request is duplicative and time-barred (see Matter of United Probation Officers Assn. v City of New York, 187 A.D.3d 456 [1st Dept, Oct. 6, 2020]; accord e.g. Matter of Stankevich v New York City Police Dept., 173 A.D.3d 507, 508 [1st Dept 2019], lv denied 35 N.Y.3d 902 [2020]).
Conversely, in opposing disclosure...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.