Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence supporting his convictions of robbery in the first degree and attempted sexual abuse in the first degree is unpreserved for appellate review since he failed to move for a trial order of dismissal specifically directed at the element he now claims was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt (see CPL 470.05[2]; People v Hawkins,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.