The record does not support the court's conclusion that the valuation of petitioner's appraiser was "suspect" because it "did not appropriately value the potential average daily room rate for units that were subject to time shares in 2017" and that respondents' appraisal was more "realistic." Rather, respondents' appraiser's calculation of the potential average daily room rate resulted in a highly inflated valuation.
We have considered respondents' argument that the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.