The record shows that Family Court properly exercised jurisdiction over respondent through substituted service of the summons, petition, and supporting documentation upon him, followed by mail service (see Family Ct Act § 427[a]). Moreover, respondent appeared in court, waived his right to counsel, and specifically declined to challenge proper service. Based on respondent's refusal to provide any proof of income to the court, the Support Magistrate properly calculated...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
