The court providently exercised its discretion in warning defendant that if he introduced evidence that he used legitimate sources of income, this might have the effect of opening the door to otherwise-inadmissible evidence that he improperly took funds from companies that were not the subject of charges in the indictment (see People v Massie,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.