In opposition to Dr. Bartol's prima facie showing that his podiatric treatment of decedent was not a proximate cause of decedent's injuries, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. The opinions of plaintiff's experts, that departures from good and accepted standards of podiatric practice by Dr. Bartol were all proximate causes of decedent's injuries, were wholly conclusory (see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
BENEFATTI v. CENTERLIGHT HEALTHCARE, INC.
Index No. 21614/14E. Appeal No. 12200. Case No. 2019-4909.
187 A.D.3d 632 (2020)
131 N.Y.S.3d 147
2020 NY Slip Op 06047
Delores Benefatti, as Administratrix of the Estate of Wanda Prezioso, Deceased, Appellant, v. Centerlight Healthcare, Inc., Formerly Known as Comprehensive Care Management Corporation, et al., Defendants, and David Matthew Bartol, D.P.M., Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided October 27, 2020.
Decided October 27, 2020.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
