1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 187 A.D.3d
  5. 187 A.D.3d 594 (2020)
 

BORGES v. ROSE

42084/15E. Appeal No. 12161-12161A. Case No. 2019-2174(1).

187 A.D.3d 594 (2020)

131 N.Y.S.3d 123

2020 NY Slip Op 06008

Dawn Borges, Appellant, v. Louis Rose, M.D., et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided October 22, 2020.

Defendants established prima facie that defendant Dr. Rose did not depart from accepted medical practice in treating plaintiff's hand (see Malone v Kim, 96 A.D.3d 477 [1st Dept 2012]). Plaintiff's contention on appeal that defendants' expert affirmation was inadmissible due to a defect in form is unpreserved for our review (see Shinn v Catanzaro, 1 A.D.3d 195

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases