The court providently exercised its discretion in denying, without a hearing, defendant's motion to vacate the judgment on the basis of newly discovered evidence. In the first place, it is undisputed that shortly after defendant's arrest, defense counsel interviewed the witness at issue, who then lived in the same building where the crime occurred and where both defendant and the victim lived. Defendant has not demonstrated that the witness should be considered newly discovered...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
