Plaintiff's complaint was properly dismissed. Initially, GAD established, prima facie, that it did not breach the parties' agreement. The parties' agreement, through which GAD was retained by plaintiff to provide interior design services, "must be enforced according to the plain meaning of its terms, and extrinsic evidence of the parties' intent may be considered only if the agreement is ambiguous" (Riverside S. Planning Corp. v CRP / Extell Riverside, L.P.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
SANTINI v. GILLIAN ABRAMS DESIGN LLC
Index No. 154151/2016. Appeal No. 11940-11940A. Case No. 2019/4508.
187 A.D.3d 453 (2020)
133 N.Y.S.3d 242
2020 NY Slip Op 05473
Diana Santini, Appellant, v. Gillian Abrams Design LLC, Respondent. (And a Third-Party Action.)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided October 6, 2020.
Decided October 6, 2020.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
