Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We agree with the Supreme Court's determination to deny those branches of the defendant's motion which were to dismiss counts 2 through 6 of a superseding indictment. Contrary to the defendant's contention, under the circumstances of this case, the People were not required to seek leave of court before re-presenting the subject charges to a new grand jury (see CPL 210.35[5]; People v Cade,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.