The trial court correctly determined that service of process was improper and dismissed the complaint, as there was no showing by plaintiff of impracticability, as required by CPLR 308(5). The selected method of service at the subject premises was not reasonably calculated to provide defendant with notice of this action, given, inter alia, the vacate order then in effect (see Mullane v Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
342 EAST 50TH STREET LLC v. PRIVITELLO
154507/18-11786. 11785, 11784, 11783, 11782.
185 A.D.3d 448 (2020)
125 N.Y.S.3d 276
2020 NY Slip Op 03853
342 East 50th Street LLC, Appellant, v. Deborah Privitello, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided July 9, 2020.
Decided July 9, 2020.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
