The IAS court did not improvidently exercise—let alone clearly abuse—its discretion by dismissing this action after plaintiff failed to comply with two so-ordered stipulations and an October 2018 conditional order that gave him a final chance to comply. Plaintiff was warned that, if he did not comply strictly and completely, defendant could move to dismiss (see e.g. Fish & Richardson, P.C. v Schindler,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
WYATT v. SUTTON
11748N. 103804/12.
185 A.D.3d 422 (2020)
125 N.Y.S.3d 686
2020 NY Slip Op 03734
Hugh Wyatt, Appellant, v. Pierre Sutton, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided July 2, 2020.
Decided July 2, 2020.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
