RAHMAN v. RAHMAN

11706N. 301573/2016.

184 A.D.3d 528 (2020)

124 N.Y.S.3d 194

2020 NY Slip Op 03608

Naazneen Rahman, Appellant, v. Zamena Rahman, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided June 25, 2020.


The court providently denied plaintiff's motion to extend the notices of pendency on the ground that she failed to show good cause for the extension, i.e., that the need for the extension did not result from her own delay in prosecuting the action (see Petervary v Bubnis, 30 A.D.3d 498, 499 [2d Dept 2006]; Tomei v Pizzitola, 142 A.D.2d 809 [3d Dept 1988]). Plaintiff asserted that the delay...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases