By modifying his initial offer of proof, defendant expressly withdrew his claim that he was entitled to ask his psychiatric expert about a self-exculpatory statement he made to the expert, bearing on the facts of the crime. The record fails to support defendant's assertion that his trial counsel merely acquiesced in the court's allegedly erroneous determination that the statement was inadmissible, nor does it establish that the court made a final adverse ruling on defendant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
