The court exercised its discretion in a provident manner in determining that appellant's motion to change venue was untimely. Appellant was aware of the venue selection clause in its own admission agreement and the agreement, which was signed by plaintiff's decedent, was in its possession at all times. However, defendant waited almost two years after the action was commenced before seeking a change of venue, and provided no reasonable explanation for the delay (see Sade...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.