ASTRAKAN v. CITY OF NEW YORK

11632. 306426/11.

184 A.D.3d 444 (2020)

125 N.Y.S.3d 709

2020 NY Slip Op 03276

Alexander Astrakan, Respondent, v. City of New York et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided June 11, 2020.


Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the City's motion for summary judgment as untimely because it was made more than 60 days after the note of issue was filed, in violation of the court's part rules. In fact, at the time of the filing of the note of issue, and for more than 60 days thereafter, the case was assigned to a different part (see Gomez v Penmark Realty Corp., 50 A.D.3d 607 [1st Dept 2008]), and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases