MATTER OF DOMINGUEZ v. O'NEILL

10869, 100728/16.

179 A.D.3d 574 (2020)

114 N.Y.S.3d 633

2020 NY Slip Op 00513

In the Matter of Nestor Dominguez, Appellant, v. James O'Neill et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided January 23, 2020.


The denial of ADR benefits was not arbitrary and capricious. The Medical Board was entitled to rely on its own examination of petitioner, which provided credible evidence for its finding that he was not disabled (see Matter of Khurana v Kelly, 73 A.D.3d 497 [1st Dept 2010], lv denied 15 N.Y.3d 715 [2010]). Furthermore, petitioner did not provide any medical evidence to the contrary.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases