BERRA v. CHSP 36TH STREET LLC

10614N. 22534/13E.

178 A.D.3d 556 (2019)

112 N.Y.S.3d 491

2019 NY Slip Op 09097

Ydalgo Berra, Respondent, v. CHSP 36th Street LLC et al., Appellants, and Rotavele Elevator, Inc., Appellant-Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided December 19, 2019.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cartafalsa, Turpin & Lenoff, New York ( Christopher J. Turpin of counsel), for appellants.

Gottlieb Siegel & Schwartz, LLP, New York ( Laura R. McKenzie of counsel), for appellant-respondent.

Louis Grandelli, P.C., New York ( Ari R. Lieberman of counsel), for respondent.

Concur—Acosta, P.J., Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels, Kapnick, JJ.


The opinion of Rotavele's expert engineer, based on his inspection of the elevator, that the mechanical design of the elevator would make it impossible for the elevator car to free-fall or even speed up, raised questions of fact as to whether the accident occurred as plaintiff alleges and whether the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applies here (see Morejon v Rais Constr. Co., 7 N.Y.3d 203, 209 [2006]).

Furthermore, given the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases