MATTER OF SHANNON E.K. v. AMIR S.

10538.

178 A.D.3d 497 (2019)

116 N.Y.S.3d 12

2019 NY Slip Op 08923

In the Matter of Shannon E.K., Respondent, v. Amir S., Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided December 12, 2019.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Friedman & Friedman, PLLC, Garden City ( Sari Friedman of counsel), for appellant.

Law Office of Wayne F. Crowe, Jr., P.C., Bronx ( Wayne F. Crowe, Jr. of counsel), for respondent.

Concur—Renwick, J.P., Gische, Mazzarelli, Moulton, JJ.


Since the father failed to raise the issue of termination of his travel credit in his written objections, that contention is unpreserved for appellate review (see Matter of Best v Hinds, 113 A.D.3d 676, 677 [2d Dept 2014]). We decline to review the issue, but as an alternative holding, find that pursuant to both Florida and New York law, the Support Magistrate properly terminated the travel credit to the father (Chapoteau v Chapoteau...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases