1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 178 A.D.3d
  5. 178 A.D.3d 486 (2019)
 

WEINSTEIN v. W.W.W. ASSOCIATES, LLC

10527. 652365/14.

178 A.D.3d 486 (2019)

111 N.Y.S.3d 544

2019 NY Slip Op 08803

Jeffrey Weinstein, Respondent, v. W.W.W. Associates, LLC, et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided December 10, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael B. Schulman & Associates, P.C., Melville ( Michael B. Shulman of counsel), for appellants.

Borah, Goldstein, Altschuler, Nahins & Goidel, P.C., New York ( David R. Brody of counsel), for respondent.

Concur—Friedman, J.P., Kapnick, Kern, Oing, JJ.

Given that defendants failed to show any significant prejudice from plaintiff's amendment of the complaint, the court providently exercised its discretion in allowing the amendment in part (see Kocourek v Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., 85 A.D.3d 502, 504 [1st Dept 2011]). Nor are the highly detailed allegations of the proposed amended complaint, which are supported by extensive documentary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases