1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 178 A.D.3d
  5. 178 A.D.3d 489 (2019)
 

BOARD OF MGRS. OF CENT. PARK PLACE CONDOMINIUM v. POTOSCHNIG

10530. 118205/09.

178 A.D.3d 489 (2019)

111 N.Y.S.3d 540

2019 NY Slip Op 08806

Board of Managers of Central Park Place Condominium, Respondent, v. Hubert Potoschnig, Also Known as Hubert W. Potoschnig, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided December 10, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert Potoschnig, appellant pro se.

Schwartz Sladkus Reich Greenberg Atlas, LLP, New York ( Debra M. Schoenberg of counsel), for respondent.

Concur— Friedman, J.P., Kapnick, Kern, Oing, JJ.

Defendant failed to preserve the arguments he makes addressed to the validity of the judgment. The arguments are also unavailing. As to the amount of the money judgment, which was stipulated to by the parties, defendant knew the amount of liability he would face if he defaulted and he willingly agreed to it (see Katz v Robinson Silverman Pearce Aronsohn & Berman, 277 A.D.2d 70, 73 [1st Dept 2000]).

Defendant's argument...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases