LANIOX v. CITY OF NEW YORK

No. 116 SSM 18.

34 N.Y.3d 994 (2019)

137 N.E.3d 499

114 N.Y.S.3d 44

2019 NY Slip Op 08448

EVELYN LANIOX, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant, and NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of New York.

Decided November 21, 2019.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

De Vivo & Company, P.C., New York City ( Edward C. De Vivo of counsel), and Popkin & Popkin, L.L.P., New York City ( Eric F. Popkin of counsel), for appellant.

Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, LLP, New York City ( Patrick J. Lawless of counsel), for respondent.


OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

The Appellate Division order should be affirmed, with costs. On this record, the New York City Housing Authority met its initial burden of demonstrating that no material triable issues of fact exist through its showing that plaintiff's assailant was likely not an intruder. In response, plaintiff failed to adduce any admissible evidence from which a jury could conclude, without engaging in speculation, that her assailant was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases