1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 177 A.D.3d
  5. 177 A.D.3d 492 (2019)
 

SMYTH v. MURPHY

10353. 157795/13.

177 A.D.3d 492 (2019)

114 N.Y.S.3d 302

2019 NY Slip Op 08353

Joseph J. Smyth, Appellant, v. Tracy Murphy et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided November 19, 2019.

There is no valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences that could possibly support the jury's verdict based on the evidence presented at trial (see Cohen v Hallmark Cards, 45 N.Y.2d 493, 498-499 [1978]). Defendant Tracy Murphy acknowledged that plaintiff's vehicle was stopped when she struck plaintiff's vehicle in the rear. Murphy's claim that plaintiff had stopped at a yellow light does not constitute a nonnegligent explanation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases