The Family Court providently exercised its discretion in determining that the incident at issue was isolated and that the threat that the father made, while upsetting to the daughter, did not lead to the conclusion that an exclusionary stay-away order of protection, excluding the father from their shared home of 37 years, was reasonably necessary to protect the daughter (Matter of Gil v Gil,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.