Defendant did not preserve his claim that, at certain places in its preliminary and final jury instructions, the court failed to state the correct standard for proof beyond a reasonable doubt, and we decline to review this claim in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find no basis for reversal. The reasonable doubt instructions, viewed as a whole, conveyed the proper standards, and nothing in these instructions was
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. CHRISTIE
10227, 2187/16.
176 A.D.3d 618 (2019)
113 N.Y.S.3d 75
2019 NY Slip Op 07738
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Paul Christie, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided October 29, 2019.
Decided October 29, 2019.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Christina A. Swarns , Office of the Appellate Defender, New York ( Dana B. Wolfe of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. , District Attorney, New York ( Diana Wang of counsel), for respondent.
Concur— Renwick, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Mazzarelli, Webber, Oing, JJ.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
