Defendants failed to establish a reasonable excuse for their failure to comply with the conditional order's discovery directives or a meritorious defense. Therefore, the court's denial of their motion to vacate was an appropriate exercise of its discretion (see Gibbs v St. Barnabas Hosp.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
HODOSY v. APOTHEKE, LLC
10207, 161964/15.
176 A.D.3d 605 (2019)
109 N.Y.S.3d 641
2019 NY Slip Op 07721
Vija Hodosy, Respondent, v. Apotheke, LLC, et al., Appellants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided October 29, 2019.
Decided October 29, 2019.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Norton & Associates, LLC, New York ( Michael E. Norton of counsel), for appellants.
The Dweck Law Firm, LLP, New York ( Christopher S. Fraser of counsel), for respondent.
Concur—Richter, J.P., Gische, Tom, Gesmer, Moulton, JJ.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
