SABO v. CANDERO

10206, 652899/13.

176 A.D.3d 603 (2019)

112 N.Y.S.3d 716

2019 NY Slip Op 07720

Abram Sabo, Appellant, v. Alberto Candero et al., Defendants, and Capital One Equipment Finance Corp. et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided October 29, 2019.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Abram Sabo, appellant pro se.

Stein Adler Dabah Zelkowitz LLP, New York ( Jonathan L. Adler of counsel), for respondents.

Concur— Richter, J.P., Gische, Tom, Gesmer, Moulton, JJ.


The complaint fails to state a cause of action for fraudulent transfer, because no assets were conveyed to Capital One as part of the loan transactions in which Capital One participated; Capital One merely acquired a security interest in the medallions (see Stickler v Ryan, 270 App Div 962, 962 [3d Dept 1946], lv dismissed 296 N.Y. 735 [1946]; Suk v Lee, 2009 NY Slip Op 31368[U], *19 [Sup Ct, Nassau County 2009]).

The tortious interference claim...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases