1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 176 A.D.3d
  5. 176 A.D.3d 573 (2019)
 

MATTER OF CAVE CR. INVS., INC. v. URBAN FT GROUP, INC.

10263N, 161999/18.

176 A.D.3d 573 (2019)

111 N.Y.S.3d 25

2019 NY Slip Op 07558

In the Matter of Cave Creek Investments, Inc., et al., Respondents, v. Urban FT Group, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided October 22, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The Mintz Fraade Law Firm, P.C., New York ( Alan P. Fraade of counsel), for appellants.

The Tsang Law Firm, P.C., New York ( Michael Tsang of counsel), for respondents.

Concur—Friedman, J.P., Kapnick, Kern, Singh, JJ.

Respondents' argument that they should not have to produce documents unrelated to the subject matter of the underlying lawsuit misconstrues the law. CPLR 5223, the relevant provision, speaks to the production of documents and materials relevant to the enforcement of the judgment. There is no requirement thereunder that the produced documents be relevant to the subject of the underlying lawsuit. Petitioners' requests, as redrafted, narrowed, and defined on page 6 of their...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases