Plaintiff alleges that she sustained serious injuries to her knees, cervical spine and lumbar spine and was unable to return to work for a year, as the result of a motor vehicle accident that occurred while riding in defendants' taxi. Defendants demonstrated prima facie that plaintiff did not sustain any serious injury causally related to that accident by submitting a radiologist's opinion that she had preexisting degenerative conditions (see Fathi v Sodhi,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
JENKINS v. LIVO CAR INC.
10172, 21588/14E.
176 A.D.3d 568 (2019)
112 N.Y.S.3d 10
2019 NY Slip Op 07553
Tanaya Jenkins, Appellant, v. Livo Car Inc. et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided October 22, 2019.
Decided October 22, 2019.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Robert D. Grace , Brooklyn, for respondents.
Concur—Renwick, J.P., Gische, Tom, Gesmer, Moulton, JJ.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
