SMITH v. PEREIRA

10071N, 305579/14.

176 A.D.3d 491 (2019)

107 N.Y.S.3d 854

2019 NY Slip Op 07357

Kerry Smith et al., Appellants, v. Lenny E. Pereira, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided October 10, 2019.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sekas Law Group, LLC, New York ( Nicholas G. Sekas of counsel), for appellants.

Law Offices of Jennifer S. Adams, Yonkers ( Jeffrey A. Domoto of counsel), for respondent.

Concur—Renwick, J.P., Gische, Kapnick, Gesmer, Moulton, JJ.


Plaintiffs' motion, denominated as one for leave to renew and reargue, was not based on new facts unavailable at the time of the original motion, and thus was actually a motion for leave to reargue, the denial of which is not appealable (CPLR 2221[e]; see Lichtman v Mount Judah Cemetery, 269 A.D.2d 319, 320 [1st Dept 2000], lv denied in part and dismissed in part

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases