Defendant's claim that the court incorrectly instructed the jury on the justified use of deadly physical force in the context of defending against a robbery is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find no basis for reversal. In three places in its oral charge, as well as in a written charge given to the jury on consent, the court stated the correct standard regarding justifiable use of deadly physical force against...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
