MATTER OF MAAME N.B. v. GODWIN E.D.C.

10053.

176 A.D.3d 483 (2019)

107 N.Y.S.3d 865

2019 NY Slip Op 07344

In the Matter of Maame N.B., Appellant, v. Godwin E.D.C., Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided October 10, 2019.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel R. Katz , New York, for appellant.

Kenneth M. Tuccillo , Hastings on Hudson, for respondent.

Concur—Renwick, J.P., Gische, Kapnick, Gesmer, Moulton, JJ.


The determination that respondent's actions were insufficient to constitute the family offenses of either menacing in the third degree or harassment in the second degree is supported by a fair preponderance of the evidence (Family Ct Act § 832). The offense of menacing in the third degree was necessarily dismissed since there was no testimony that respondent's conduct was physically menacing (Penal Law § 120.15; Matter of Akheem B., 308 A...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases