1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 176 A.D.3d
  5. 176 A.D.3d 480 (2019)
 

HIXON v. 12-14 EAST 64TH OWNERS CORP.

10050N, 157114/16.

176 A.D.3d 480 (2019)

107 N.Y.S.3d 858

2019 NY Slip Op 07341

Verina Hixon, Appellant-Respondent, v. 12-14 East 64th Owners Corp. et al., Respondents-Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided October 10, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Waxman & Waxman, P.C., New York ( Lawrence D. Waxman of counsel), and Leonard M. Kohen , New York, for appellant-respondent.

Rosenberg & Estis, P.C., New York ( Bradley S. Silverbush of counsel), for respondents-appellants.

Concur—Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Kern, Oing, Singh, JJ.

We find that an appeal lies from an order denying a motion to hear and determine pursuant to CPLR 4317(b) (see Davidson v Sterngass, 279 App Div 875, 875 [2d Dept 1952]). We agree with the motion court's determination that an order of reference was not necessary, because all of the proof necessary to determine whether the fees were reasonable was before the court (see Domino Media v Kranis, 215 A...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases