MACKLOWE v. MACKLOWE

10040, 350044/16.

176 A.D.3d 470 (2019)

112 N.Y.S.3d 95

2019 NY Slip Op 07331

Linda Macklowe, Appellant, v. Harry Macklowe, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided October 10, 2019.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Holwell Shuster & Goldberg LLP, New York ( Daniel Sullivan of counsel), for appellant.

Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, New York ( David Boies of counsel), for respondent.

Concur—Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Kern, Oing, Singh, JJ.


Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in directing that certain artwork listed in Schedules II and III be sold and the net proceeds distributed equally between the parties. For these works of art, the parties' retained experts presented wildly divergent valuations—in one instance their valuations differed by $30 million— which the court attributed to the lack of comparable data, such as a recent auction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases