The court providently exercised its discretion in denying defendant's belated challenge for cause to a selected juror (see CPL 270.15[2]). Although the juror had not been sworn, jury selection had been completed, and defendant's request was for substitution of an alternate. Furthermore, the specific arguments defendant made at the time of the challenge did not require excusal of the juror for cause, and defendant did not request that the juror be recalled.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
