Ordered that order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The defendant challenges his designation as a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law art 6-C [hereinafter SORA]) based upon his convictions, upon a jury verdict, of, inter alia, sodomy in the first degree and sexual abuse in the first degree.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, he was properly assessed points under risk factor 11 for...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
