Charles contends that this mortgage foreclosure action is time-barred, because the six year statute of limitations was triggered by a prior foreclosure action, in which plaintiff accelerated the mortgage debt. Plaintiff counters that, because it had failed to comply with a contractual 30-day notice requirement in accordance with section 22 of the mortgage, the mortgage was not accelerated by the prior action.
In the prior order, Supreme Court granted plaintiff's motion...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
