The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. The only issue raised by defendant on appeal is whether the People sufficiently established that the search of his pant leg at the police precinct was incident to his arrest, rather than an unauthorized strip search. However, defendant did not raise this issue at the hearing, and the court "did not expressly decide, in response to protest, the issues now raised on appeal" (People v Miranda,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. ANDERSON
5606/13, 9584A, 4373/16, 9584.
173 A.D.3d 486 (2019)
102 N.Y.S.3d 190
2019 NY Slip Op 04650
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Taquan Anderson, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided June 11, 2019.
Decided June 11, 2019.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
