1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 173 A.D.3d
  5. 173 A.D.3d 442 (2019)
 

BORDEN LP v. TPG SIXTH STREET PARTNERS

9545, 657398/17.

173 A.D.3d 442 (2019)

103 N.Y.S.3d 385

2019 NY Slip Op 04465

Borden LP, Plaintiff, v. TPG Sixth Street Partners et al., Defendants. TPG Sixth Street Partners, LLC, et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Michael Borden et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents, et al., Third-Party Defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided June 6, 2019.

The third-party complaint alleges facts sufficient to support a finding that third-party defendants Michael Borden and PRS1000 had a sufficiently close relationship with the signatories of the subject agreement to confer on the court personal jurisdiction over them pursuant to the agreement's jurisdiction clause (see Universal Inv. Advisory SA v Bakrie Telecom Pte., Ltd., 154 A.D.3d 171, 179 [1st Dept 2017]). In light of the facts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases