Although the order of protection has expired by its own terms, it still imposes enduring consequences, and therefore this appeal is not moot (see Matter of Veronica P. v Radcliff A.,
The finding that respondent committed acts in 2012 that constitute assault in the second degree is not supported by a fair preponderance of the evidence (see Family Ct Act § 832).
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.