1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 173 A.D.3d
  5. 173 A.D.3d 401 (2019)
 

MATTER OF WIMBLEDON FINANCING MASTER FUND, LTD. v. BERGSTEIN

150584/16, 9218N, 9217.

173 A.D.3d 401 (2019)

103 N.Y.S.3d 378

2019 NY Slip Op 04320

In the Matter of Wimbledon Financing Master Fund, Ltd., Respondent-Appellant, v. David Bergstein et al., Respondents. Steven J. Katzman et al., Nonparty Appellants-Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided June 4, 2019.

The motion court providently exercised its discretion in finding that Katzman was sufficiently aware of the restraining notices to be held, along with his firm, in civil contempt for wilful neglect of the notices (see Kanbar v Quad Cinema Corp., 151 Misc.2d 439, 441 [App Term, 1st Dept 1991], affd as mod 195 A.D.2d 412 [1st Dept 1993];

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases