Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The defendant's contention that the Supreme Court, in determining his risk level under the Sex Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law art 6-C [hereinafter SORA]), improperly assessed him points under risk factor 1 is unpreserved for appellate review, since he did not object to the assessment of these points at the SORA hearing (see People v Hitchcock,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.