Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the Supreme Court's Molineux ruling (see People v Molineux, 168 N.Y. 264 [1901]) was improper. However, since the People did not elicit in their case in chief any testimony or evidence regarding any prior bad acts by the defendant, the defendant cannot establish that he was prejudiced by the purportedly improper ruling (see People v Prentice,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.