The Surrogate correctly awarded petitioner statutory prejudgment interest based on the finding that respondents breached the contract embodied in the promissory note (see CPLR 5001 [a]). Respondents need not have derived some benefit from petitioner to be required to pay statutory interest; interest is merely compensation of the wronged party for the loss of its money (J. D'Addario & Co., Inc. v Embassy Indus., Inc.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF GOULD
9366, 947G/08.
172 A.D.3d 554 (2019)
98 N.Y.S.3d 747
2019 NY Slip Op 03918
In the Matter of David Gould, as Co-Executor of the Estate of Harry Rodman, Deceased, Respondent. Alan Bronstein et al., Appellants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided May 21, 2019.
Decided May 21, 2019.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.