In 1991, defendant entered into a lease for a rent-stabilized apartment. The apartment was subject to rent stabilization as a result of the building's receiving benefits under RPTL 421-a. The lease provided for a fixed 40-year term that would expire in 2031. Although paragraphs 1 and 36A of the lease required defendant to name an occupant of the apartment, no occupant was ever named. By sublease entered into the same day, defendant sublet the apartment to two sisters for...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
