Defendant's claim that the court should have excused a juror for cause based on his allegedly disqualifying statements during voir dire, notwithstanding the absence of any challenge, is not only unpreserved but unreviewable. By statute (CPL 270.20 [2]), an allegedly erroneous failure to excuse a prospective juror for cause is only cognizable when a defendant challenges the panelist for cause, the court denies the challenge, the defendant (who, as here, has peremptory challenges...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
