Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
In November 2009, the defendant was designated a level two sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law art 6-C [hereinafter SORA]). In November 2011, the defendant petitioned pursuant to Correction Law § 168-o (2) for a downward modification of his risk level classification from level two to level one. In an order dated June 28, 2012, the Supreme Court denied...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
