1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 172 A.D.3d
  5. 172 A.D.3d 513 (2019)
 

MATTER OF KOTOWSKI v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY

9312, 158519/17.

172 A.D.3d 513 (2019)

98 N.Y.S.3d 429

2019 NY Slip Op 03740

In the Matter of Adam Kotowski, Appellant, v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided May 14, 2019.

Respondents' determination was not arbitrary and capricious and had a rational basis (see generally Matter of Peckham v Calogero, 12 N.Y.3d 424, 431 [2009]). Respondent Port Authority "has wide discretion in determining the fitness of candidates. . . particularly . . . in the hiring of law enforcement officers, to whom high standards may be applied" (Matter of City of New York v New York City Civ. Serv. Commn.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases